Chippewa vs Scottish Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chippewa
Scottish
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chippewa
Scottish
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,834
SOCIAL INDEX
65.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
139th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Scottish Integration in Chippewa Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,386,101 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Scottish within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.040. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Scottish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to a decrease of 3.3 Scottish.
Chippewa vs Scottish Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $102,123, a difference of 21.7%), per capita income ($36,631 compared to $44,440, a difference of 21.3%), and median household income ($70,539 compared to $85,101, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $50,554, a difference of 7.5%), median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $38,397, a difference of 9.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $61,735, a difference of 14.6%).
Income Metric | Chippewa | Scottish |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,631 | Good $44,440 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $86,852 | Good $104,288 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,539 | Average $85,101 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,287 | Average $46,463 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,368 | Good $55,793 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,003 | Tragic $38,397 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,015 | Tragic $50,554 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $80,005 | Average $94,622 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $83,943 | Good $102,123 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,847 | Good $61,735 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.0% | Tragic 29.1% |
Chippewa vs Scottish Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 48.7%), family poverty (11.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 41.4%), and male poverty (14.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 39.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.8% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 6.0%), single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 15.4%), and single male poverty (16.4% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 17.2%).
Poverty Metric | Chippewa | Scottish |
Poverty | Tragic 15.7% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Families | Tragic 11.2% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Males | Tragic 14.6% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females | Tragic 16.7% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 25.9% | Tragic 20.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 18.0% | Fair 13.9% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.4% | Good 16.9% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 20.5% | Exceptional 15.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.0% | Exceptional 15.2% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.6% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.4% | Tragic 14.0% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.8% | Tragic 21.8% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.8% | Tragic 17.7% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.8% | Tragic 30.1% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Chippewa vs Scottish Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 68.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 42.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 39.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 8.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 9.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Chippewa | Scottish |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Females | Tragic 6.1% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 18.0% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.3% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.8% | Good 6.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.8% | Average 5.5% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.1% | Tragic 10.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.3% | Poor 7.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 11.1% | Tragic 9.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Chippewa vs Scottish Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 4.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 0.43%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 1.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chippewa | Scottish |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.1% | Tragic 63.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.3% | Tragic 78.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 43.8% | Exceptional 42.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.1% | Exceptional 77.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.9% | Average 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.6% | Tragic 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.9% | Tragic 83.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.3% | Tragic 82.2% |
Chippewa vs Scottish Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 38.6%), single father households (3.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 34.7%), and births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 34.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.11, a difference of 3.1%), and family households (62.1% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 3.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Chippewa | Scottish |
Family Households | Tragic 62.1% | Good 64.5% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.7% | Tragic 27.0% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.1% | Exceptional 49.0% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Tragic 3.11 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.1% | Good 2.3% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.2% | Exceptional 49.2% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 12.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 42.6% | Average 31.7% |
Chippewa vs Scottish Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 39.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 61.2%, a difference of 7.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 1.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 3.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 5.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chippewa | Scottish |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 6.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 90.7% | Exceptional 93.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.2% | Exceptional 61.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.5% | Exceptional 22.6% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Chippewa vs Scottish Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 32.8%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 31.4%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.14%), 5th grade (98.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.14%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.15%).
Education Level Metric | Chippewa | Scottish |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Exceptional 1.4% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.7% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.6% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.6% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.6% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.5% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.3% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.1% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.3% | Exceptional 97.5% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Exceptional 97.3% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Exceptional 96.5% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Exceptional 95.6% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.5% | Exceptional 94.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.5% | Exceptional 93.0% |
High School Diploma | Excellent 89.7% | Exceptional 91.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.2% | Exceptional 87.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.6% | Exceptional 67.0% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.7% | Excellent 60.5% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.7% | Good 46.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.6% | Average 38.1% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Good 15.2% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Good 4.6% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Excellent 2.0% |
Chippewa vs Scottish Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 21.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.8% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 17.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 3.6%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 5.6%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 6.9%).
Disability Metric | Chippewa | Scottish |
Disability | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 12.9% |
Males | Tragic 14.3% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 13.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Tragic 1.6% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 6.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 7.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.0% | Tragic 12.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.8% | Fair 23.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.4% | Exceptional 46.7% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.0% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Exceptional 16.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Average 2.5% |