Swiss vs Chinese Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Swiss
Chinese
Births to Unmarried Women
Births to Unmarried Women Comparison
Swiss
Chinese
30.5%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
83.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
140th/ 347
METRIC RANK
30.2%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
87.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
127th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Swiss vs Chinese Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 422,325,964 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Swiss and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.161 and weighted average of 30.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,513,648 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.522 and weighted average of 30.2%, a difference of 0.78%.
Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Swiss | Chinese |
| Minimum | 6.7% | 5.5% |
| Maximum | 52.4% | 100.0% |
| Range | 45.7% | 94.5% |
| Mean | 27.3% | 41.4% |
| Median | 27.7% | 33.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.6% | 24.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 34.3% | 48.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.6% | 24.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.8% | 25.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.6% | 25.4% |
Demographics Similar to Swiss and Chinese by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Swiss are Pakistani (30.5%, a difference of 0.020%), South African (30.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Uganda (30.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Canada (30.4%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Philippines (30.4%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are European (30.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Vietnamese (30.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Croatian (30.2%, a difference of 0.22%), Icelander (30.3%, a difference of 0.24%), and Syrian (30.2%, a difference of 0.25%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
| Syrians | 88.2 /100 | #123 | Excellent 30.2% |
| Croatians | 88.0 /100 | #124 | Excellent 30.2% |
| Vietnamese | 87.7 /100 | #125 | Excellent 30.2% |
| Europeans | 87.2 /100 | #126 | Excellent 30.2% |
| Chinese | 87.1 /100 | #127 | Excellent 30.2% |
| Icelanders | 86.0 /100 | #128 | Excellent 30.3% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 85.8 /100 | #129 | Excellent 30.3% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 85.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 30.3% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 85.7 /100 | #131 | Excellent 30.3% |
| New Zealanders | 85.5 /100 | #132 | Excellent 30.3% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 85.2 /100 | #133 | Excellent 30.4% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 85.2 /100 | #134 | Excellent 30.4% |
| Brazilians | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 30.4% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 30.4% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 83.9 /100 | #137 | Excellent 30.4% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 83.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 30.4% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 83.7 /100 | #139 | Excellent 30.4% |
| Swiss | 83.1 /100 | #140 | Excellent 30.5% |
| Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #141 | Excellent 30.5% |
| South Africans | 82.7 /100 | #142 | Excellent 30.5% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 82.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 30.5% |