Slovene vs Chickasaw Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Slovene
Chickasaw
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Slovenes
Chickasaw
13.0%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
21.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
200th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.3%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Slovene vs Chickasaw Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 233,782,721 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Slovenes and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.139 and weighted average of 13.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,053,704 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.328 and weighted average of 16.3%, a difference of 25.4%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Slovene | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 1.3% | 4.0% |
Maximum | 46.9% | 67.9% |
Range | 45.6% | 63.9% |
Mean | 17.3% | 25.6% |
Median | 13.7% | 23.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.2% | 16.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 26.2% | 31.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.1% | 14.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.1% | 12.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.0% | 12.6% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Slovenes by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Slovenes are Trinidadian and Tobagonian (13.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Norway (13.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Lithuanian (13.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Basque (13.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Bangladesh (13.0%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Immigrants | South Africa | 26.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 13.0% |
Liberians | 25.2 /100 | #194 | Fair 13.0% |
Immigrants | England | 23.4 /100 | #195 | Fair 13.0% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 23.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 13.0% |
Immigrants | Laos | 23.1 /100 | #197 | Fair 13.0% |
Lithuanians | 22.1 /100 | #198 | Fair 13.0% |
Immigrants | Norway | 21.8 /100 | #199 | Fair 13.0% |
Slovenes | 21.6 /100 | #200 | Fair 13.0% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 21.4 /100 | #201 | Fair 13.0% |
Basques | 20.7 /100 | #202 | Fair 13.0% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 20.4 /100 | #203 | Fair 13.0% |
Estonians | 20.3 /100 | #204 | Fair 13.0% |
Poles | 19.3 /100 | #205 | Poor 13.0% |
Northern Europeans | 18.9 /100 | #206 | Poor 13.0% |
Sudanese | 17.7 /100 | #207 | Poor 13.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Chippewa (16.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Marshallese (16.4%, a difference of 0.78%), Black/African American (16.2%, a difference of 0.80%), Osage (16.5%, a difference of 0.91%), and Dutch West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 16.0% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 16.0% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 16.1% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 16.1% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 16.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.1% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.0% |