Immigrants vs Ghanaian Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants
Ghanaian
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants
Ghanaians
10.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
3.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
225th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.3%
FAMILY POVERTY
1.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
241st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants vs Ghanaian Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 572,663,107 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.271 and weighted average of 10.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 190,166,438 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.096 and weighted average of 10.3%, a difference of 3.1%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants | Ghanaian |
| Minimum | 5.5% | 2.3% |
| Maximum | 61.7% | 26.7% |
| Range | 56.2% | 24.4% |
| Mean | 10.8% | 9.9% |
| Median | 10.2% | 9.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.9% | 6.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.9% | 11.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.0% | 5.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.7% | 5.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.7% | 5.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants and Ghanaians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants are Marshallese (9.9%, a difference of 0.25%), Ottawa (10.0%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Armenia (10.0%, a difference of 0.29%), Sudanese (10.0%, a difference of 0.49%), and Immigrants from Uzbekistan (10.0%, a difference of 0.51%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ghanaians are Immigrants from the Azores (10.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Potawatomi (10.2%, a difference of 0.39%), French American Indian (10.2%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from Laos (10.2%, a difference of 0.80%), and Alaska Native (10.4%, a difference of 0.86%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Africa | 4.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 9.9% |
| Marshallese | 3.9 /100 | #224 | Tragic 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 3.6 /100 | #225 | Tragic 10.0% |
| Ottawa | 3.3 /100 | #226 | Tragic 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 3.3 /100 | #227 | Tragic 10.0% |
| Sudanese | 3.1 /100 | #228 | Tragic 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 3.1 /100 | #229 | Tragic 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 3.1 /100 | #230 | Tragic 10.0% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 2.7 /100 | #231 | Tragic 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 2.3 /100 | #232 | Tragic 10.1% |
| Fijians | 2.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 2.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 10.1% |
| Nigerians | 2.0 /100 | #235 | Tragic 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.9 /100 | #236 | Tragic 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 1.7 /100 | #237 | Tragic 10.2% |
| French American Indians | 1.5 /100 | #238 | Tragic 10.2% |
| Potawatomi | 1.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 1.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 10.3% |
| Ghanaians | 1.3 /100 | #241 | Tragic 10.3% |
| Alaska Natives | 1.0 /100 | #242 | Tragic 10.4% |
| Nepalese | 0.8 /100 | #243 | Tragic 10.4% |