Immigrants from South Africa vs Chinese Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from South Africa
Chinese
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from South Africa
Chinese
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
95.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
98th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
97.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
85th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from South Africa vs Chinese Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 233,222,881 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Africa and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.234 and weighted average of 2.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,795,588 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.356 and weighted average of 2.0%, a difference of 0.84%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from South Africa | Chinese |
Minimum | 0.40% | 0.40% |
Maximum | 8.6% | 6.4% |
Range | 8.2% | 6.0% |
Mean | 2.9% | 2.3% |
Median | 2.2% | 2.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.8% | 1.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.7% | 2.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.9% | 0.78% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.0% | 1.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.9% | 1.00% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Africa and Chinese by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Africa are Immigrants from Afghanistan (2.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Estonian (2.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Romanian (2.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Greek (2.1%, a difference of 0.11%), and Australian (2.1%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Moldova (2.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Latvia (2.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Switzerland (2.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Norwegian (2.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Eastern Africa (2.0%, a difference of 0.14%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Soviet Union | 97.6 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Poland | 97.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 97.5 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 97.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Chinese | 97.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 97.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 97.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Norwegians | 97.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 97.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 96.7 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 96.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Syria | 96.2 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Europe | 96.1 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 96.0 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Australians | 95.9 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Romanians | 95.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 95.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Estonians | 95.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Greeks | 95.1 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Albanians | 94.9 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 2.1% |