Immigrants from Russia vs Immigrants from Malaysia Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Russia
Immigrants from Malaysia
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Russia
Immigrants from Malaysia
8.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
93.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
117th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
86.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
135th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Russia vs Immigrants from Malaysia Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 347,005,908 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Russia and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.178 and weighted average of 8.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 197,782,180 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.197 and weighted average of 8.5%, a difference of 2.8%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Russia | Immigrants from Malaysia |
| Minimum | 1.9% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 21.6% | 26.4% |
| Range | 19.6% | 25.3% |
| Mean | 8.5% | 8.3% |
| Median | 7.7% | 7.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.0% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.6% | 10.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.6% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.2% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 4.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Malaysia by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Russia are South African (8.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Western Europe (8.2%, a difference of 0.19%), French (8.3%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Egypt (8.3%, a difference of 0.83%), and Native Hawaiian (8.3%, a difference of 0.99%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Malaysia are Chilean (8.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Brazil (8.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Sri Lankan (8.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Argentina (8.4%, a difference of 0.55%), and Puget Sound Salish (8.4%, a difference of 0.69%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| South Africans | 93.4 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 93.2 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 92.9 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| French | 92.8 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 91.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Native Hawaiians | 91.3 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Paraguayans | 91.2 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Palestinians | 91.1 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Soviet Union | 90.8 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Pakistanis | 90.8 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Icelanders | 90.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 89.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Argentineans | 89.6 /100 | #128 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Portuguese | 89.2 /100 | #129 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 88.6 /100 | #130 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 88.6 /100 | #131 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 88.2 /100 | #132 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Sri Lankans | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Chileans | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 86.5 /100 | #135 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 86.3 /100 | #136 | Excellent 8.5% |