Immigrants from Bahamas vs Comanche Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Bahamas
Comanche
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Bahamas
Comanche
11.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
271st/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
267th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Bahamas vs Comanche Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,583,559 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bahamas and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.292 and weighted average of 11.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,722,823 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.506 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 0.84%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Bahamas | Comanche |
Minimum | 1.5% | 4.3% |
Maximum | 26.2% | 50.0% |
Range | 24.7% | 45.7% |
Mean | 12.3% | 14.5% |
Median | 11.4% | 13.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.8% | 10.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.7% | 15.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.9% | 5.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.6% | 8.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.5% | 8.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bahamas and Comanche by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bahamas are Immigrants from Jamaica (11.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Ecuador (11.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (11.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Somali (11.2%, a difference of 0.61%), and Spanish American (11.2%, a difference of 0.70%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Comanche are Immigrants from El Salvador (11.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Jamaican (11.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Ecuador (11.1%, a difference of 0.58%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (11.1%, a difference of 0.59%), and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (10.9%, a difference of 0.91%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 10.9% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 10.9% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 10.9% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 11.0% |
Comanche | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 11.0% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 11.2% |
Somalis | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 11.2% |
Spanish Americans | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 11.2% |
Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 11.2% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 11.2% |
Chippewa | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 11.2% |
Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #278 | Tragic 11.2% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 11.3% |