Blackfeet vs Chinese Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Blackfeet
Chinese
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Blackfeet
Chinese
15.5%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
305th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
14th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Blackfeet vs Chinese Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,257,695 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Blackfeet and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.152 and weighted average of 15.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,746,830 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.376 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 41.1%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Blackfeet | Chinese |
Minimum | 10.3% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 57.9% |
Range | 89.7% | 56.4% |
Mean | 44.4% | 11.9% |
Median | 37.0% | 11.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 24.6% | 5.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 59.8% | 13.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 35.2% | 8.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 26.6% | 9.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 26.1% | 9.2% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Blackfeet by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Blackfeet are Pennsylvania German (15.6%, a difference of 0.43%), Alaska Native (15.4%, a difference of 0.53%), Aleut (15.4%, a difference of 0.64%), Ute (15.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and Alsatian (15.2%, a difference of 1.7%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 15.0% |
Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 15.0% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 15.1% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 15.2% |
Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 15.2% |
Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 15.4% |
Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 15.4% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 15.5% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 15.6% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 15.7% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 15.8% |
Americans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 15.8% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 15.9% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 16.0% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 16.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Korean (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (10.9%, a difference of 0.57%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (10.9%, a difference of 0.69%), Immigrants from Philippines (10.9%, a difference of 0.76%), and Immigrants from Fiji (10.9%, a difference of 0.78%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Taiwanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Koreans | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.2% |