Immigrants from China vs Croatian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from China
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Croatian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from China

Croatians

Good
Excellent
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,930
SOCIAL INDEX
86.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
37th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Croatian Integration in Immigrants from China Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 343,029,301 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Croatians within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.468. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Croatians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to a decrease of 4.4 Croatians.
Immigrants from China Integration in Croatian Communities

Immigrants from China vs Croatian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Croatian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $102,414, a difference of 16.9%), median household income ($105,335 compared to $90,685, a difference of 16.2%), and median female earnings ($46,972 compared to $40,993, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 8.6%), householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $63,225, a difference of 9.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $51,662, a difference of 12.1%).
Immigrants from China vs Croatian Income
Income MetricImmigrants from ChinaCroatian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$54,264
Exceptional
$47,742
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$125,540
Exceptional
$111,370
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$105,335
Exceptional
$90,685
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$56,638
Exceptional
$49,724
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$67,353
Exceptional
$59,715
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$46,972
Exceptional
$40,993
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$57,931
Fair
$51,662
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$119,756
Exceptional
$102,414
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$122,178
Exceptional
$108,383
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$69,174
Exceptional
$63,225
Wage/Income Gap
Poor
26.7%
Tragic
29.0%

Immigrants from China vs Croatian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Croatian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 26.0%), married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 26.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 0.30%), child poverty among boys under 16 (13.6% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 3.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.3% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 3.6%).
Immigrants from China vs Croatian Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from ChinaCroatian
Poverty
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
10.6%
Families
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
7.3%
Males
Excellent
10.7%
Exceptional
9.6%
Females
Exceptional
12.5%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Average
20.2%
Exceptional
19.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
12.5%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Exceptional
15.4%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.3%
Exceptional
13.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Exceptional
14.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Exceptional
14.1%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.4%
Average
12.8%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.1%
Exceptional
19.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.9%
Tragic
17.1%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.1%
Exceptional
28.2%
Married Couples
Excellent
5.0%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.5%
Exceptional
9.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
10.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
9.6%

Immigrants from China vs Croatian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Croatian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 23.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 20.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.23%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.91%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.9%).
Immigrants from China vs Croatian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from ChinaCroatian
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Average
11.6%
Exceptional
10.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.5%
Exceptional
16.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Fair
10.4%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Excellent
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Poor
5.2%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
9.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.2%
Good
7.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.7%
Good
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.0%

Immigrants from China vs Croatian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Croatian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 41.1%, a difference of 32.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 8.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.28%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.50%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.54%).
Immigrants from China vs Croatian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from ChinaCroatian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.4%
Tragic
64.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.1%
Exceptional
41.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
71.1%
Exceptional
77.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.6%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.4%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.2%
Exceptional
83.6%

Immigrants from China vs Croatian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Croatian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 22.3%), divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 18.6%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.4% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 0.19%), family households (64.7% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and currently married (47.9% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 2.2%).
Immigrants from China vs Croatian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from ChinaCroatian
Family Households
Excellent
64.7%
Tragic
63.8%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.4%
Tragic
26.4%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.4%
Exceptional
48.5%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Tragic
3.10
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.5%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.9%
Exceptional
48.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.0%
Excellent
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
24.7%
Excellent
30.2%

Immigrants from China vs Croatian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Croatian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 83.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 13.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 8.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 8.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 13.0%).
Immigrants from China vs Croatian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from ChinaCroatian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
8.3%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.9%
Exceptional
91.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
51.5%
Exceptional
58.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.2%
Exceptional
20.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Poor
6.0%
Good
6.5%

Immigrants from China vs Croatian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Croatian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 75.5%), doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 52.5%), and professional degree (6.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 36.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.2%).
Immigrants from China vs Croatian Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from ChinaCroatian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.5%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Exceptional
98.0%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Exceptional
97.4%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Exceptional
97.2%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.3%
Exceptional
96.5%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.2%
Exceptional
95.7%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Exceptional
94.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.3%
Exceptional
93.5%
High School Diploma
Good
89.3%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
86.9%
Exceptional
88.8%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.9%
Exceptional
68.3%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.4%
Exceptional
62.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
55.5%
Exceptional
49.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
48.4%
Exceptional
40.6%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
21.2%
Exceptional
16.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.7%
Exceptional
4.9%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
3.1%
Exceptional
2.0%

Immigrants from China vs Croatian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Croatian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 59.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 32.2%), and hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 1.4%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 3.4%).
Immigrants from China vs Croatian Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from ChinaCroatian
Disability
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
12.1%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
11.8%
Females
Exceptional
10.7%
Fair
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.96%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Fair
5.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
8.7%
Good
11.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
20.3%
Exceptional
21.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.3%
Exceptional
45.7%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.6%
Tragic
3.4%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.9%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.3%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.4%