Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Scotland Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Scotland
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Scotland
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,011
SOCIAL INDEX
87.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
36th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Scotland Integration in Immigrants from China Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 187,899,891 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Scotland within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.246. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from Scotland. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to a decrease of 1.1 Immigrants from Scotland.
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Scotland Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $105,089, a difference of 14.0%), median female earnings ($46,972 compared to $41,771, a difference of 12.4%), and median household income ($105,335 compared to $94,091, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $66,620, a difference of 3.8%), wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 7.7%), and per capita income ($54,264 compared to $49,893, a difference of 8.8%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Scotland |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $54,264 | Exceptional $49,893 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $125,540 | Exceptional $114,392 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $105,335 | Exceptional $94,091 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $56,638 | Exceptional $50,741 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $67,353 | Exceptional $61,220 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $46,972 | Exceptional $41,771 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $57,931 | Good $52,638 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $119,756 | Exceptional $105,089 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $122,178 | Exceptional $112,175 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $69,174 | Exceptional $66,620 |
Wage/Income Gap | Poor 26.7% | Tragic 28.7% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Scotland Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 25.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 23.6%), and married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (13.3% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 3.4%), child poverty among boys under 16 (13.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.4% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 4.5%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Scotland |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Males | Excellent 10.7% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Females | Exceptional 12.5% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.2% | Exceptional 18.6% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Exceptional 15.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.3% | Exceptional 13.7% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Exceptional 14.1% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.4% | Exceptional 14.0% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.4% | Good 12.7% |
Single Females | Exceptional 18.1% | Exceptional 19.4% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.9% | Tragic 16.7% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.1% | Exceptional 27.6% |
Married Couples | Excellent 5.0% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.5% | Exceptional 9.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.6% | Exceptional 9.0% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Scotland Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 21.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 20.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.55%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Scotland |
Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Average 11.6% | Excellent 11.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.5% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Fair 10.4% | Good 10.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Average 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Average 4.5% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Poor 5.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.2% | Good 7.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.7% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Scotland Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 23.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 0.14%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.23%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Scotland |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.4% | Tragic 64.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.7% | Average 79.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.1% | Exceptional 38.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 71.1% | Exceptional 75.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.6% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.4% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Excellent 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.2% | Good 83.0% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Scotland Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 23.2%), divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 19.4%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.7% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.010%), married-couple households (48.4% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 2.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Scotland |
Family Households | Excellent 64.7% | Excellent 64.7% |
Family Households with Children | Average 27.4% | Tragic 26.8% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.4% | Exceptional 49.3% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Tragic 3.12 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 1.8% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.5% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.9% | Exceptional 49.3% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 10.0% | Good 12.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 24.7% | Excellent 30.4% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Scotland Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 81.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 14.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 8.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 10.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 14.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Scotland |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 8.3% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 84.9% | Exceptional 91.8% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 51.5% | Exceptional 58.9% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.2% | Exceptional 20.8% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Poor 6.0% | Excellent 6.7% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Scotland Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 57.3%), doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 42.4%), and professional degree (6.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.99%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.99%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.0%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Scotland |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 98.0% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Exceptional 97.8% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.0% | Exceptional 96.8% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.3% | Exceptional 96.1% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.2% | Exceptional 95.2% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Exceptional 94.2% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.3% | Exceptional 93.0% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.3% | Exceptional 91.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 86.9% | Exceptional 88.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.9% | Exceptional 69.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.4% | Exceptional 63.4% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 55.5% | Exceptional 50.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 48.4% | Exceptional 42.3% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 21.2% | Exceptional 17.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.7% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 3.1% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Scotland Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 42.4%), hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 27.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.0%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 4.4%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Scotland |
Disability | Exceptional 10.1% | Fair 11.8% |
Males | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 11.6% |
Females | Exceptional 10.7% | Good 12.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 0.96% | Tragic 1.4% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Good 5.6% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Poor 6.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 8.7% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 20.3% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.3% | Exceptional 45.1% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.8% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.6% | Tragic 3.3% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.9% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.3% | Good 6.0% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Exceptional 2.4% |