Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Australia Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Australia
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Australia
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,900
SOCIAL INDEX
86.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
40th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Australia Integration in Immigrants from China Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 219,089,368 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.074. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Immigrants from Australia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to an increase of 0.7 Immigrants from Australia.
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Australia Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($54,264 compared to $57,953, a difference of 6.8%), wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 5.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $115,947, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $69,164, a difference of 0.010%), median male earnings ($67,353 compared to $67,634, a difference of 0.42%), and median earnings ($56,638 compared to $56,305, a difference of 0.59%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Australia |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $54,264 | Exceptional $57,953 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $125,540 | Exceptional $126,620 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $105,335 | Exceptional $102,562 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $56,638 | Exceptional $56,305 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $67,353 | Exceptional $67,634 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $46,972 | Exceptional $46,573 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $57,931 | Exceptional $56,660 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $119,756 | Exceptional $115,947 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $122,178 | Exceptional $119,308 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $69,174 | Exceptional $69,164 |
Wage/Income Gap | Poor 26.7% | Tragic 28.2% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Australia Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 13.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 9.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (13.6% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 2.3%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.3% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 2.7%), and female poverty (12.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.8%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Australia |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 7.6% |
Males | Excellent 10.7% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Females | Exceptional 12.5% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.2% | Tragic 20.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Exceptional 14.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.3% | Exceptional 13.6% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Exceptional 13.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.4% | Exceptional 14.0% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.4% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Single Females | Exceptional 18.1% | Exceptional 19.4% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.9% | Exceptional 15.7% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.1% | Exceptional 27.3% |
Married Couples | Excellent 5.0% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.5% | Excellent 10.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.2% | Average 12.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.6% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Australia Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 8.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 8.2%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.70%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Australia |
Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Females | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Youth < 25 | Average 11.6% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.5% | Average 17.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Fair 10.4% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Average 4.5% | Average 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.1% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 5.4% | Excellent 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Poor 5.2% | Excellent 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.2% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Australia Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 12.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.86%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.25%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.34%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Australia |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.4% | Exceptional 65.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.7% | Exceptional 80.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.1% | Tragic 35.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 71.1% | Poor 74.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.6% | Exceptional 85.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.4% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Exceptional 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.2% | Good 82.9% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Australia Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 12.2%), births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 7.9%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.63%), currently married (47.9% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.13, a difference of 3.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Australia |
Family Households | Excellent 64.7% | Tragic 61.3% |
Family Households with Children | Average 27.4% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.4% | Average 46.5% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Tragic 3.13 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 1.8% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.9% | Excellent 47.3% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 24.7% | Exceptional 26.6% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Australia Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 9.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 3.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 52.4%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.78%), 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 52.4%, a difference of 1.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Australia |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 13.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 84.9% | Tragic 86.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 51.5% | Tragic 52.4% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.2% | Tragic 18.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Poor 6.0% | Tragic 5.8% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Australia Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 46.5%), doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 10.2%), and college, under 1 year (70.9% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (48.4% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 0.18%), associate's degree (55.5% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 0.61%), and nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.86%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Australia |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Exceptional 97.5% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.0% | Exceptional 96.5% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.3% | Exceptional 95.8% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.2% | Exceptional 94.9% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Exceptional 94.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.3% | Exceptional 92.9% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.3% | Exceptional 91.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 86.9% | Exceptional 88.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.9% | Exceptional 72.7% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.4% | Exceptional 67.7% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 55.5% | Exceptional 55.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 48.4% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 21.2% | Exceptional 20.9% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.7% | Exceptional 6.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 3.1% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Australia Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 20.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 12.3%), and hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.8%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Australia |
Disability | Exceptional 10.1% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Males | Exceptional 9.5% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 0.96% | Exceptional 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 8.7% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 20.3% | Exceptional 21.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.3% | Exceptional 45.5% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.8% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.6% | Good 2.9% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.9% | Good 17.1% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.3% | Exceptional 5.5% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Exceptional 2.3% |