Immigrants from China vs Hopi Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Hopi
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from China
Hopi
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,478
SOCIAL INDEX
12.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
306th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Hopi Integration in Immigrants from China Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 72,370,794 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Hopi within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.033. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Hopi. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to a decrease of 0.2 Hopi.
Immigrants from China vs Hopi Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($54,264 compared to $31,177, a difference of 74.1%), median family income ($125,540 compared to $77,188, a difference of 62.6%), and median household income ($105,335 compared to $65,043, a difference of 62.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $46,978, a difference of 23.3%), wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 33.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $50,925, a difference of 35.8%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from China | Hopi |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $54,264 | Tragic $31,177 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $125,540 | Tragic $77,188 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $105,335 | Tragic $65,043 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $56,638 | Tragic $36,871 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $67,353 | Tragic $42,060 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $46,972 | Tragic $33,932 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $57,931 | Tragic $46,978 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $119,756 | Tragic $75,002 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $122,178 | Tragic $75,562 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $69,174 | Tragic $50,925 |
Wage/Income Gap | Poor 26.7% | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants from China vs Hopi Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.4% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 141.7%), receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 125.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 111.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (26.1% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 32.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 39.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 42.6%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from China | Hopi |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 20.8% |
Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 15.9% |
Males | Excellent 10.7% | Tragic 20.8% |
Females | Exceptional 12.5% | Tragic 21.0% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.2% | Tragic 28.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 23.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Tragic 27.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.3% | Tragic 27.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Tragic 25.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.4% | Tragic 27.9% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 27.5% |
Single Females | Exceptional 18.1% | Tragic 28.0% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.9% | Tragic 27.2% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.1% | Tragic 34.5% |
Married Couples | Excellent 5.0% | Tragic 7.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.5% | Tragic 17.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 18.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.6% | Tragic 21.6% |
Immigrants from China vs Hopi Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 169.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 133.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 116.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from China | Hopi |
Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Tragic 8.9% |
Males | Good 5.2% | Tragic 10.8% |
Females | Good 5.2% | Tragic 8.1% |
Youth < 25 | Average 11.6% | Tragic 21.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.5% | Tragic 30.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Fair 10.4% | Tragic 19.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 13.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 11.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 8.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Average 4.5% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Tragic 8.1% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.1% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 5.4% | Tragic 5.5% |
Seniors > 65 | Poor 5.2% | Tragic 5.3% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 16.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.7% | Tragic 12.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 7.4% |
Immigrants from China vs Hopi Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 58.4%, a difference of 12.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 71.7%, a difference of 11.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 7.7%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from China | Hopi |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.4% | Tragic 58.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.7% | Tragic 71.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.1% | Tragic 31.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 71.1% | Tragic 66.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.6% | Tragic 76.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.4% | Tragic 79.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Tragic 77.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.2% | Tragic 75.0% |
Immigrants from China vs Hopi Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 50.8%, a difference of 105.9%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 67.5%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 53.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.7% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.85%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 8.7%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.60, a difference of 11.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from China | Hopi |
Family Households | Excellent 64.7% | Exceptional 65.3% |
Family Households with Children | Average 27.4% | Tragic 25.2% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.4% | Tragic 36.7% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Exceptional 3.60 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 1.8% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 8.5% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.9% | Tragic 36.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 13.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 24.7% | Tragic 50.8% |
Immigrants from China vs Hopi Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 14.0%), no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 10.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 0.31%), 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 5.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from China | Hopi |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 13.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 84.9% | Tragic 86.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 51.5% | Tragic 49.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.2% | Tragic 18.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Poor 6.0% | Exceptional 6.9% |
Immigrants from China vs Hopi Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (21.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 94.8%), doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 92.0%), and bachelor's degree (48.4% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 91.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.2% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.34%), 9th grade (94.3% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 0.55%), and 11th grade (92.3% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 0.63%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from China | Hopi |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.6% | Poor 2.2% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Excellent 97.7% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Good 97.5% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Good 97.2% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Excellent 96.3% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.0% | Good 95.9% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.3% | Fair 94.8% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.2% | Fair 93.5% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Tragic 91.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.3% | Tragic 88.6% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.3% | Tragic 86.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 86.9% | Tragic 83.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.9% | Tragic 57.1% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.4% | Tragic 50.9% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 55.5% | Tragic 34.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 48.4% | Tragic 25.3% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 21.2% | Tragic 10.9% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.7% | Tragic 3.6% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 3.1% | Tragic 1.6% |
Immigrants from China vs Hopi Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 380.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 59.3%), and vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 58.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 5.8%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 52.9%, a difference of 14.2%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 26.0%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from China | Hopi |
Disability | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 13.2% |
Males | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 12.5% |
Females | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 13.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 0.96% | Tragic 4.6% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 8.7% | Tragic 13.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 20.3% | Tragic 30.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.3% | Tragic 52.9% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.8% | Tragic 2.9% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.6% | Tragic 3.9% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.9% | Tragic 17.9% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 7.6% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.9% |