Immigrants from South Africa vs Scottish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 232,751,268 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Scottish within Immigrant from South Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.643. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.145% in Scottish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South Africa corresponds to an increase of 144.7 Scottish.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,465 compared to $44,440, a difference of 15.8%), median male earnings ($62,899 compared to $55,793, a difference of 12.7%), and median household income ($95,800 compared to $85,101, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 2.2%), householder income under 25 years ($51,705 compared to $50,554, a difference of 2.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,234 compared to $61,735, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.7% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 9.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 9.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (10.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.030%), poverty (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.31%), and female poverty (12.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 26.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 9.3%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.39%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 14.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.41%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.51%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 9.9%), births to unmarried women (29.3% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 8.1%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.12%), family households (63.7% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 44.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 19.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 3.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 61.2%, a difference of 7.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 16.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 31.6%), master's degree (18.8% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 23.6%), and no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.36%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.37%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 42.7%), hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 22.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age over 75 (45.3% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 3.1%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 7.8%).