Osage vs Scottish Community Comparison

COMPARE

Osage
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Scottish
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Osage

Scottish

Fair
Good
3,726
SOCIAL INDEX
34.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
211th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,834
SOCIAL INDEX
65.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
139th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Scottish Integration in Osage Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,666,415 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Scottish within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.349. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.111% in Scottish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to a decrease of 111.1 Scottish.
Osage Integration in Scottish Communities

Osage vs Scottish Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,390 compared to $102,123, a difference of 15.5%), median family income ($91,926 compared to $104,288, a difference of 13.5%), and median household income ($75,240 compared to $85,101, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($36,034 compared to $38,397, a difference of 6.6%), wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 7.6%), and median earnings ($42,651 compared to $46,463, a difference of 8.9%).
Osage vs Scottish Income
Income MetricOsageScottish
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,568
Good
$44,440
Median Family Income
Tragic
$91,926
Good
$104,288
Median Household Income
Tragic
$75,240
Average
$85,101
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,651
Average
$46,463
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$50,292
Good
$55,793
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$36,034
Tragic
$38,397
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,764
Tragic
$50,554
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$84,461
Average
$94,622
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$88,390
Good
$102,123
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$55,677
Good
$61,735
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.1%
Tragic
29.1%

Osage vs Scottish Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 27.6%), family poverty (9.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 22.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (18.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (19.0% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 7.2%), single mother poverty (32.6% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 8.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 8.3%).
Osage vs Scottish Poverty
Poverty MetricOsageScottish
Poverty
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
11.5%
Families
Tragic
9.7%
Exceptional
7.9%
Males
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.5%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.4%
Fair
13.9%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.6%
Good
16.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.9%
Exceptional
15.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.7%
Exceptional
15.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
15.4%
Single Males
Tragic
16.5%
Tragic
14.0%
Single Females
Tragic
24.4%
Tragic
21.8%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.0%
Tragic
17.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
32.6%
Tragic
30.1%
Married Couples
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Excellent
10.6%
Exceptional
9.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
10.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Average
11.7%
Exceptional
9.9%

Osage vs Scottish Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 19.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 17.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.80%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 1.6%).
Osage vs Scottish Unemployment
Unemployment MetricOsageScottish
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Males
Average
5.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
10.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Exceptional
16.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Average
6.7%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.3%
Average
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
4.9%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.8%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.9%
Tragic
10.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.5%
Poor
7.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Good
8.9%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
5.1%

Osage vs Scottish Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 7.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 0.65%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.0% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.1%).
Osage vs Scottish Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricOsageScottish
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.5%
Tragic
63.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.0%
Tragic
78.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.0%
Exceptional
42.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Good
75.3%
Exceptional
77.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.3%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.3%
Tragic
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.9%
Tragic
83.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.6%
Tragic
82.2%

Osage vs Scottish Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.5%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 7.8%), and divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (32.1% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 1.1%), family households (63.7% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.2%).
Osage vs Scottish Family Structure
Family Structure MetricOsageScottish
Family Households
Tragic
63.7%
Good
64.5%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.9%
Exceptional
49.0%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Good
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Average
6.4%
Exceptional
5.8%
Currently Married
Excellent
47.5%
Exceptional
49.2%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
12.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Fair
32.1%
Average
31.7%

Osage vs Scottish Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 28.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 4.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 61.2%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 0.44%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 61.2%, a difference of 4.2%).
Osage vs Scottish Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricOsageScottish
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.7%
Exceptional
6.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.4%
Exceptional
93.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.8%
Exceptional
61.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.7%
Exceptional
22.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
7.4%

Osage vs Scottish Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 24.2%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 23.2%), and master's degree (12.6% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.34%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.34%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.34%).
Osage vs Scottish Education Level
Education Level MetricOsageScottish
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.4%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.7%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.6%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
98.1%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Exceptional
97.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
97.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Exceptional
96.5%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.2%
Exceptional
95.6%
11th Grade
Good
92.7%
Exceptional
94.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Fair
91.0%
Exceptional
93.0%
High School Diploma
Average
89.1%
Exceptional
91.4%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.8%
Exceptional
87.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.7%
Exceptional
67.0%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.8%
Excellent
60.5%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
41.5%
Good
46.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
33.0%
Average
38.1%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.6%
Good
15.2%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Good
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.7%
Excellent
2.0%

Osage vs Scottish Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 17.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.5% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 16.5%), and vision disability (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 4.1%), cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 5.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 6.3%).
Osage vs Scottish Disability
Disability MetricOsageScottish
Disability
Tragic
14.2%
Tragic
12.9%
Males
Tragic
14.0%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Tragic
14.3%
Tragic
13.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.8%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
6.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.3%
Tragic
7.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.5%
Tragic
12.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.5%
Fair
23.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.8%
Exceptional
46.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.7%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
4.1%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.8%
Exceptional
16.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.4%
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Average
2.5%