Creek vs Scottish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 177,929,527 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Scottish within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.342. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.037% in Scottish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to a decrease of 36.5 Scottish.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $102,123, a difference of 29.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $94,622, a difference of 26.4%), and median family income ($82,560 compared to $104,288, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 7.4%), householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $50,554, a difference of 11.4%), and median female earnings ($33,437 compared to $38,397, a difference of 14.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (11.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 46.7%), married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 44.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.5% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 43.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 10.0%), single father poverty (19.8% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 11.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.2% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 16.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 29.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 20.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 0.52%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 7.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.1% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 22.1%), births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 18.4%), and divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.2% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.52%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.11, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 15.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 61.2%, a difference of 5.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 1.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 47.3%), professional degree (3.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 47.2%), and master's degree (10.5% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 44.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.25%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.25%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 38.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 36.5%), and ambulatory disability (8.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 0.070%), cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 8.0%), and disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 10.1%).