U.S. Virgin Islander vs Chinese Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
U.S. Virgin Islander
Chinese
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
U.S. Virgin Islanders
Chinese
14.5%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
290th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
14th/ 347
METRIC RANK
U.S. Virgin Islander vs Chinese Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 85,320,269 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of U.S. Virgin Islanders and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.596 and weighted average of 14.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,746,830 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.376 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 32.3%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | U.S. Virgin Islander | Chinese |
Minimum | 0.45% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 57.9% |
Range | 99.5% | 56.4% |
Mean | 18.4% | 11.9% |
Median | 14.5% | 11.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.8% | 5.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.5% | 13.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.7% | 8.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.8% | 9.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.7% | 9.2% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to U.S. Virgin Islanders by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to U.S. Virgin Islanders are Bahamian (14.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Dominica (14.5%, a difference of 0.23%), Nonimmigrants (14.6%, a difference of 0.28%), White/Caucasian (14.5%, a difference of 0.31%), and Iroquois (14.5%, a difference of 0.32%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 14.2% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 14.4% |
French | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 14.4% |
Celtics | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 14.5% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 14.5% |
Whites/Caucasians | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 14.5% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 14.5% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 14.6% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 14.6% |
French Canadians | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 14.6% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 14.6% |
Scotch-Irish | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 14.7% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 14.7% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 14.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Korean (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (10.9%, a difference of 0.57%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (10.9%, a difference of 0.69%), Immigrants from Philippines (10.9%, a difference of 0.76%), and Immigrants from Fiji (10.9%, a difference of 0.78%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Taiwanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Koreans | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.2% |