Cheyenne vs Chinese Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Cheyenne
Chinese
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Cheyenne
Chinese
16.1%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
315th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
14th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cheyenne vs Chinese Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 78,255,059 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Cheyenne and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.269 and weighted average of 16.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,746,830 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.376 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 46.7%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Cheyenne | Chinese |
Minimum | 13.3% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 57.9% |
Range | 86.7% | 56.4% |
Mean | 44.4% | 11.9% |
Median | 38.2% | 11.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.7% | 5.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 60.0% | 13.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 41.3% | 8.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 30.0% | 9.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 29.1% | 9.2% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Cheyenne by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cheyenne are Alaskan Athabascan (16.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Dutch West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Cherokee (16.1%, a difference of 0.33%), Black/African American (16.2%, a difference of 0.48%), and Comanche (16.0%, a difference of 0.56%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 15.8% |
Americans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 15.8% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 15.9% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 16.0% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 16.0% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 16.1% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 16.1% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 16.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.1% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Korean (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (10.9%, a difference of 0.57%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (10.9%, a difference of 0.69%), Immigrants from Philippines (10.9%, a difference of 0.76%), and Immigrants from Fiji (10.9%, a difference of 0.78%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Taiwanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Koreans | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.2% |