Central American Indian vs Chinese Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Central American Indian
Chinese
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Central American Indians
Chinese
17.2%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
326th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
14th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Central American Indian vs Chinese Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 299,936,739 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.595 and weighted average of 17.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,746,830 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.376 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 57.1%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Central American Indian | Chinese |
Minimum | 9.7% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 57.9% |
Range | 90.3% | 56.4% |
Mean | 43.3% | 11.9% |
Median | 36.0% | 11.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.8% | 5.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 56.8% | 13.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 38.0% | 8.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 27.4% | 9.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 27.2% | 9.2% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Central American Indians by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Central American Indians are Choctaw (17.0%, a difference of 1.6%), Immigrants from Yemen (16.9%, a difference of 2.3%), Creek (16.8%, a difference of 2.4%), Menominee (17.7%, a difference of 2.7%), and Shoshone (16.7%, a difference of 3.5%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.0% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 17.2% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 17.7% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 18.3% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 18.4% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 19.1% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 19.3% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 19.6% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 20.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Korean (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (10.9%, a difference of 0.57%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (10.9%, a difference of 0.69%), Immigrants from Philippines (10.9%, a difference of 0.76%), and Immigrants from Fiji (10.9%, a difference of 0.78%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Taiwanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Koreans | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.2% |