Immigrants from Uganda vs Chinese Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Uganda
Chinese
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Uganda
Chinese
12.6%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
75.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
14th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Uganda vs Chinese Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 119,797,773 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.014 and weighted average of 12.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,746,830 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.376 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 14.8%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Uganda | Chinese |
Minimum | 2.7% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 50.0% | 57.9% |
Range | 47.3% | 56.4% |
Mean | 14.6% | 11.9% |
Median | 12.4% | 11.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.8% | 5.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.0% | 13.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.1% | 8.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.5% | 9.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.3% | 9.2% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Uganda by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uganda are Okinawan (12.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from France (12.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Hawaiian (12.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Lebanon (12.6%, a difference of 0.070%), and Native Hawaiian (12.6%, a difference of 0.070%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 81.9 /100 | #135 | Excellent 12.5% |
Immigrants | Austria | 81.9 /100 | #136 | Excellent 12.5% |
Ukrainians | 80.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 12.6% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 80.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 12.6% |
Cubans | 79.9 /100 | #139 | Good 12.6% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 78.0 /100 | #140 | Good 12.6% |
Okinawans | 75.9 /100 | #141 | Good 12.6% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 75.9 /100 | #142 | Good 12.6% |
Immigrants | France | 75.8 /100 | #143 | Good 12.6% |
Hawaiians | 75.1 /100 | #144 | Good 12.6% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 75.0 /100 | #145 | Good 12.6% |
Native Hawaiians | 75.0 /100 | #146 | Good 12.6% |
Malaysians | 74.8 /100 | #147 | Good 12.6% |
Yugoslavians | 73.9 /100 | #148 | Good 12.6% |
Sierra Leoneans | 73.0 /100 | #149 | Good 12.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Korean (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (10.9%, a difference of 0.57%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (10.9%, a difference of 0.69%), Immigrants from Philippines (10.9%, a difference of 0.76%), and Immigrants from Fiji (10.9%, a difference of 0.78%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Taiwanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Koreans | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.2% |