U.S. Virgin Islander vs Chinese Married-couple Households
COMPARE
U.S. Virgin Islander
Chinese
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
U.S. Virgin Islanders
Chinese
39.8%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
326th/ 347
METRIC RANK
50.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
10th/ 347
METRIC RANK
U.S. Virgin Islander vs Chinese Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 87,508,365 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of U.S. Virgin Islanders and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.336 and weighted average of 39.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,801,742 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.128 and weighted average of 50.4%, a difference of 26.6%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | U.S. Virgin Islander | Chinese |
Minimum | 7.8% | 35.3% |
Maximum | 70.0% | 63.0% |
Range | 62.2% | 27.8% |
Mean | 40.0% | 50.6% |
Median | 40.6% | 51.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 35.2% | 46.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 45.7% | 56.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.5% | 9.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.0% | 7.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.9% | 7.4% |
Similar Demographics by Married-couple Households
Demographics Similar to U.S. Virgin Islanders by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to U.S. Virgin Islanders are Pueblo (40.0%, a difference of 0.46%), Lumbee (39.6%, a difference of 0.47%), Navajo (40.1%, a difference of 0.69%), Immigrants from Zaire (40.1%, a difference of 0.70%), and Puerto Rican (40.1%, a difference of 0.70%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 40.5% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 40.3% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 40.3% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 40.1% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 40.1% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 40.1% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 40.0% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 39.8% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 39.6% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 39.4% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 39.4% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 39.2% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 39.0% |
Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 39.0% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 39.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Pennsylvania German (50.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Pakistan (50.1%, a difference of 0.44%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (50.6%, a difference of 0.55%), Swiss (49.9%, a difference of 0.81%), and Immigrants from Korea (49.9%, a difference of 0.98%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 51.9% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 51.8% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 51.6% |
Danes | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 51.1% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 51.0% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 50.6% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 50.4% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 50.4% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 50.1% |
Swiss | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 49.9% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 49.9% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 49.8% |
Koreans | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 49.7% |
Swedes | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 49.7% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 49.6% |