U.S. Virgin Islander vs Chinese Male Poverty
COMPARE
U.S. Virgin Islander
Chinese
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
U.S. Virgin Islanders
Chinese
14.7%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
319th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.7%
MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
U.S. Virgin Islander vs Chinese Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 87,513,000 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of U.S. Virgin Islanders and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.637 and weighted average of 14.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,801,112 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.236 and weighted average of 8.7%, a difference of 69.4%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | U.S. Virgin Islander | Chinese |
Minimum | 2.7% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 62.0% | 29.4% |
Range | 59.3% | 28.2% |
Mean | 16.8% | 9.7% |
Median | 14.9% | 8.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.4% | 4.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.7% | 12.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.3% | 7.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.1% | 6.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.0% | 6.4% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to U.S. Virgin Islanders by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to U.S. Virgin Islanders are Immigrants from Grenada (14.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Dominica (14.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Congo (14.7%, a difference of 0.090%), British West Indian (14.6%, a difference of 0.76%), and Chippewa (14.6%, a difference of 0.79%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 14.6% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 14.6% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 14.6% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 14.6% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 14.7% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 14.7% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 14.7% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 14.7% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 15.1% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 15.2% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 15.2% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 15.3% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 15.3% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 15.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Thai (8.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Taiwan (8.9%, a difference of 2.4%), Maltese (9.1%, a difference of 4.4%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (9.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and Immigrants from Ireland (9.1%, a difference of 5.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.5% |