Luxembourger vs Chinese Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Luxembourger
Chinese
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Luxembourgers
Chinese
13.4%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
3.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
236th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
14th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Luxembourger vs Chinese Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 133,228,824 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.205 and weighted average of 13.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,746,830 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.376 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 21.6%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Luxembourger | Chinese |
Minimum | 4.0% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 48.3% | 57.9% |
Range | 44.3% | 56.4% |
Mean | 22.6% | 11.9% |
Median | 20.9% | 11.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.5% | 5.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 33.9% | 13.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 21.4% | 8.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.4% | 9.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.1% | 9.2% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Bangladeshi (13.3%, a difference of 0.050%), British West Indian (13.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Canadian (13.3%, a difference of 0.15%), British (13.3%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Ghana (13.4%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Europeans | 6.2 /100 | #229 | Tragic 13.3% |
Ghanaians | 6.1 /100 | #230 | Tragic 13.3% |
Slavs | 5.3 /100 | #231 | Tragic 13.3% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 5.0 /100 | #232 | Tragic 13.3% |
British | 4.0 /100 | #233 | Tragic 13.3% |
Canadians | 4.0 /100 | #234 | Tragic 13.3% |
Bangladeshis | 3.7 /100 | #235 | Tragic 13.3% |
Luxembourgers | 3.6 /100 | #236 | Tragic 13.4% |
British West Indians | 3.4 /100 | #237 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 3.2 /100 | #238 | Tragic 13.4% |
Czechoslovakians | 3.0 /100 | #239 | Tragic 13.4% |
Belizeans | 2.3 /100 | #240 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Germany | 2.1 /100 | #241 | Tragic 13.4% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 2.1 /100 | #242 | Tragic 13.4% |
Barbadians | 2.1 /100 | #243 | Tragic 13.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Korean (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (10.9%, a difference of 0.57%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (10.9%, a difference of 0.69%), Immigrants from Philippines (10.9%, a difference of 0.76%), and Immigrants from Fiji (10.9%, a difference of 0.78%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Taiwanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Koreans | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.2% |