Bermudan vs Chinese Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Bermudan
Chinese
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Bermudans
Chinese
13.1%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
13.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
217th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
14th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bermudan vs Chinese Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,324,345 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Bermudans and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.233 and weighted average of 13.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,746,830 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.376 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 19.4%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bermudan | Chinese |
| Minimum | 4.8% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 50.0% | 57.9% |
| Range | 45.2% | 56.4% |
| Mean | 16.1% | 11.9% |
| Median | 13.6% | 11.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.4% | 5.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.5% | 13.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.1% | 8.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.2% | 9.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.0% | 9.2% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Bermudans by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bermudans are Scandinavian (13.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (13.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Austrian (13.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Japanese (13.1%, a difference of 0.19%), and Zimbabwean (13.1%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 16.8 /100 | #210 | Poor 13.1% |
| Swedes | 16.8 /100 | #211 | Poor 13.1% |
| Senegalese | 16.4 /100 | #212 | Poor 13.1% |
| Italians | 15.9 /100 | #213 | Poor 13.1% |
| Zimbabweans | 14.9 /100 | #214 | Poor 13.1% |
| Japanese | 14.8 /100 | #215 | Poor 13.1% |
| Austrians | 13.9 /100 | #216 | Poor 13.1% |
| Bermudans | 13.0 /100 | #217 | Poor 13.1% |
| Scandinavians | 12.9 /100 | #218 | Poor 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 12.6 /100 | #219 | Poor 13.1% |
| Central Americans | 10.9 /100 | #220 | Poor 13.2% |
| New Zealanders | 10.7 /100 | #221 | Poor 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 10.0 /100 | #222 | Poor 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 9.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Somalis | 9.1 /100 | #224 | Tragic 13.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Korean (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (10.9%, a difference of 0.57%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (10.9%, a difference of 0.69%), Immigrants from Philippines (10.9%, a difference of 0.76%), and Immigrants from Fiji (10.9%, a difference of 0.78%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Taiwanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Koreans | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.2% |