Immigrants from Caribbean vs Chinese Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Caribbean
Chinese
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Caribbean
Chinese
13.3%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
5.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
232nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
14th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Caribbean vs Chinese Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 393,892,998 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Caribbean and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.230 and weighted average of 13.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,746,830 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.376 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 21.0%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Caribbean | Chinese |
Minimum | 2.4% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 31.5% | 57.9% |
Range | 29.0% | 56.4% |
Mean | 12.8% | 11.9% |
Median | 13.0% | 11.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.5% | 5.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.4% | 13.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 8.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.1% | 9.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.1% | 9.2% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Caribbean by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Caribbean are Slavic (13.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Ghanaian (13.3%, a difference of 0.27%), British (13.3%, a difference of 0.29%), Canadian (13.3%, a difference of 0.29%), and European (13.3%, a difference of 0.30%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Denmark | 8.7 /100 | #225 | Tragic 13.2% |
Jamaicans | 7.7 /100 | #226 | Tragic 13.2% |
Haitians | 7.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 13.2% |
Lebanese | 6.6 /100 | #228 | Tragic 13.2% |
Europeans | 6.2 /100 | #229 | Tragic 13.3% |
Ghanaians | 6.1 /100 | #230 | Tragic 13.3% |
Slavs | 5.3 /100 | #231 | Tragic 13.3% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 5.0 /100 | #232 | Tragic 13.3% |
British | 4.0 /100 | #233 | Tragic 13.3% |
Canadians | 4.0 /100 | #234 | Tragic 13.3% |
Bangladeshis | 3.7 /100 | #235 | Tragic 13.3% |
Luxembourgers | 3.6 /100 | #236 | Tragic 13.4% |
British West Indians | 3.4 /100 | #237 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 3.2 /100 | #238 | Tragic 13.4% |
Czechoslovakians | 3.0 /100 | #239 | Tragic 13.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Korean (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (10.9%, a difference of 0.57%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (10.9%, a difference of 0.69%), Immigrants from Philippines (10.9%, a difference of 0.76%), and Immigrants from Fiji (10.9%, a difference of 0.78%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Taiwanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Koreans | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.2% |