Immigrants from Egypt vs Chinese Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Egypt
Chinese
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Egypt
Chinese
11.4%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
29th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
14th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Egypt vs Chinese Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,464,124 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Egypt and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.029 and weighted average of 11.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,746,830 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.376 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 3.8%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Egypt | Chinese |
Minimum | 4.7% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 26.3% | 57.9% |
Range | 21.6% | 56.4% |
Mean | 11.5% | 11.9% |
Median | 11.2% | 11.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.3% | 5.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.9% | 13.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 8.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 9.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.8% | 9.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Egypt and Chinese by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Egypt are Iranian (11.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Asia (11.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Iran (11.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from China (11.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Japan (11.3%, a difference of 0.88%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Korean (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (10.9%, a difference of 0.57%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (10.9%, a difference of 0.69%), Immigrants from Philippines (10.9%, a difference of 0.76%), and Bhutanese (11.1%, a difference of 0.81%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Philippines | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Koreans | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Japan | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 11.4% |