Syrian vs Chinese Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Syrian
Chinese
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Syrians
Chinese
20.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
90.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
140th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
1st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Syrian vs Chinese Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 263,006,420 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Syrians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.150 and weighted average of 20.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,651,041 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.244 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 25.6%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Syrian | Chinese |
| Minimum | 0.97% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 58.7% | 43.0% |
| Range | 57.7% | 41.7% |
| Mean | 21.0% | 16.1% |
| Median | 20.2% | 16.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.6% | 9.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 26.4% | 20.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.8% | 10.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.0% | 9.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.8% | 9.1% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Syrians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Syrians are Slovene (20.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Kuwait (20.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Nepal (20.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from North America (20.3%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Iraq (20.2%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | England | 91.9 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 91.5 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 91.2 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 91.2 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 90.6 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Slovenes | 90.5 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 90.4 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Syrians | 90.4 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Immigrants | North America | 89.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 89.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Australians | 88.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 88.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Austrians | 85.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Venezuelans | 85.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 20.4% |
| South Africans | 85.3 /100 | #147 | Excellent 20.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Taiwan (16.4%, a difference of 1.3%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (16.5%, a difference of 2.4%), Immigrants from India (16.8%, a difference of 4.2%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (17.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and Filipino (17.0%, a difference of 5.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 16.5% |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 17.3% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |