Cree vs Chinese Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Cree
Chinese
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Cree
Chinese
24.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
286th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
1st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cree vs Chinese Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 75,960,780 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Cree and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.369 and weighted average of 24.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,651,041 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.244 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 49.5%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cree | Chinese |
| Minimum | 12.2% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 43.0% |
| Range | 87.8% | 41.7% |
| Mean | 39.2% | 16.1% |
| Median | 30.5% | 16.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 21.2% | 9.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 47.1% | 20.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 25.9% | 10.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 24.7% | 9.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 24.4% | 9.1% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Cree by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cree are Immigrants from Guatemala (24.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Bangladeshi (24.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Spanish American (24.2%, a difference of 0.17%), U.S. Virgin Islander (24.2%, a difference of 0.22%), and Indonesian (24.3%, a difference of 0.57%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 23.7% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 23.8% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 23.8% |
| German Russians | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 23.9% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 23.9% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 24.1% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 24.1% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 24.2% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 24.2% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 24.2% |
| Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 24.3% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 24.4% |
| Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 24.5% |
| Americans | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 24.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Taiwan (16.4%, a difference of 1.3%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (16.5%, a difference of 2.4%), Immigrants from India (16.8%, a difference of 4.2%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (17.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and Filipino (17.0%, a difference of 5.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 16.5% |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 17.3% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |