Soviet Union vs Chinese Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Soviet Union
Chinese
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Soviet Union
Chinese
19.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
91st/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
1st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Soviet Union vs Chinese Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,439,502 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.649 and weighted average of 19.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,651,041 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.244 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 21.2%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Soviet Union | Chinese |
Minimum | 3.3% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 43.0% |
Range | 96.7% | 41.7% |
Mean | 20.7% | 16.1% |
Median | 18.1% | 16.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.8% | 9.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.9% | 20.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.0% | 10.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.1% | 9.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.9% | 9.1% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Soviet Union by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Soviet Union are Italian (19.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Lebanon (19.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Austria (19.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Ukraine (19.5%, a difference of 0.24%), and Afghan (19.5%, a difference of 0.25%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Sweden | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Albania | 99.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Greeks | 99.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Zimbabweans | 99.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 19.5% |
Afghans | 99.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 19.5% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 99.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 19.5% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 19.6% |
Soviet Union | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 19.6% |
Italians | 98.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 19.6% |
Immigrants | Austria | 98.8 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 19.6% |
Romanians | 98.6 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 19.6% |
Estonians | 98.2 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 19.7% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 98.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 19.7% |
Croatians | 98.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 19.7% |
Immigrants | France | 97.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 19.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Taiwan (16.4%, a difference of 1.3%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (16.5%, a difference of 2.4%), Immigrants from India (16.8%, a difference of 4.2%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (17.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and Filipino (17.0%, a difference of 5.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 16.1% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 16.4% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 16.5% |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 17.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |