American vs Chinese Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
American
Chinese
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Americans
Chinese
24.5%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
293rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
1st/ 347
METRIC RANK
American vs Chinese Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 559,828,526 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Americans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.639 and weighted average of 24.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,651,041 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.244 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 51.9%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | American | Chinese |
| Minimum | 6.2% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 43.0% |
| Range | 93.8% | 41.7% |
| Mean | 39.7% | 16.1% |
| Median | 33.3% | 16.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 27.3% | 9.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 42.3% | 20.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.0% | 10.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.8% | 9.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 20.7% | 9.1% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Americans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Americans are Alsatian (24.5%, a difference of 0.080%), French American Indian (24.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Osage (24.4%, a difference of 0.44%), Hispanic or Latino (24.6%, a difference of 0.49%), and African (24.8%, a difference of 0.98%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 24.1% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 24.2% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 24.2% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 24.2% |
| Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 24.3% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 24.4% |
| Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 24.5% |
| Americans | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 24.5% |
| French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 24.6% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 24.6% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 24.8% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 24.8% |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 24.9% |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 25.0% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 25.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Taiwan (16.4%, a difference of 1.3%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (16.5%, a difference of 2.4%), Immigrants from India (16.8%, a difference of 4.2%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (17.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and Filipino (17.0%, a difference of 5.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 16.5% |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 17.3% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |