Swedish vs Chinese Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Swedish
Chinese
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Swedes
Chinese
20.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
77.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
153rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
1st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Swedish vs Chinese Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 521,559,813 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Swedes and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.661 and weighted average of 20.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,651,041 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.244 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 27.7%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Swedish | Chinese |
| Minimum | 7.9% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 43.0% |
| Range | 92.1% | 41.7% |
| Mean | 35.5% | 16.1% |
| Median | 26.8% | 16.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 20.1% | 9.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 43.5% | 20.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 23.4% | 10.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 23.9% | 9.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 23.7% | 9.1% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Swedes by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Swedes are Immigrants from Western Europe (20.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Uruguay (20.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Samoan (20.6%, a difference of 0.10%), South American Indian (20.6%, a difference of 0.13%), and Puget Sound Salish (20.6%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Venezuelans | 85.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 20.4% |
| South Africans | 85.3 /100 | #147 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Luxembourgers | 84.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Portuguese | 81.5 /100 | #149 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |
| Swedes | 77.1 /100 | #153 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 20.6% |
| Samoans | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 20.6% |
| South American Indians | 75.7 /100 | #156 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |
| Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
| Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Taiwan (16.4%, a difference of 1.3%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (16.5%, a difference of 2.4%), Immigrants from India (16.8%, a difference of 4.2%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (17.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and Filipino (17.0%, a difference of 5.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 16.5% |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 17.3% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |