Welsh vs Chinese Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Welsh
Chinese
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Welsh
Chinese
22.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
5.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
231st/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
1st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Welsh vs Chinese Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 513,029,164 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Welsh and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.501 and weighted average of 22.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,651,041 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.244 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 36.1%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Welsh | Chinese |
Minimum | 13.7% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 43.0% |
Range | 86.3% | 41.7% |
Mean | 39.5% | 16.1% |
Median | 30.2% | 16.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 23.5% | 9.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 45.7% | 20.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 22.3% | 10.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 22.8% | 9.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 22.5% | 9.1% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Welsh by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Welsh are Immigrants from Thailand (22.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Western Africa (22.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Tlingit-Haida (21.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Spaniard (22.0%, a difference of 0.11%), and Spanish (22.0%, a difference of 0.11%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Barbadians | 7.2 /100 | #224 | Tragic 21.8% |
English | 6.4 /100 | #225 | Tragic 21.9% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 5.8 /100 | #226 | Tragic 21.9% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 5.8 /100 | #227 | Tragic 21.9% |
Salvadorans | 5.5 /100 | #228 | Tragic 21.9% |
Tlingit-Haida | 5.4 /100 | #229 | Tragic 21.9% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 5.3 /100 | #230 | Tragic 22.0% |
Welsh | 5.0 /100 | #231 | Tragic 22.0% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 5.0 /100 | #232 | Tragic 22.0% |
Spaniards | 4.7 /100 | #233 | Tragic 22.0% |
Spanish | 4.7 /100 | #234 | Tragic 22.0% |
Dutch | 4.6 /100 | #235 | Tragic 22.0% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 4.2 /100 | #236 | Tragic 22.0% |
Vietnamese | 4.0 /100 | #237 | Tragic 22.0% |
French Canadians | 2.8 /100 | #238 | Tragic 22.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Taiwan (16.4%, a difference of 1.3%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (16.5%, a difference of 2.4%), Immigrants from India (16.8%, a difference of 4.2%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (17.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and Filipino (17.0%, a difference of 5.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 16.1% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 16.4% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 16.5% |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 17.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |