Malaysian vs Chinese Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Malaysian
Chinese
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Malaysians
Chinese
22.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
2.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
239th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
1st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Malaysian vs Chinese Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,481,570 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Malaysians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.254 and weighted average of 22.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,651,041 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.244 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 37.4%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Malaysian | Chinese |
Minimum | 8.7% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 72.7% | 43.0% |
Range | 64.0% | 41.7% |
Mean | 30.8% | 16.1% |
Median | 25.6% | 16.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 20.8% | 9.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 41.7% | 20.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 20.9% | 10.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.7% | 9.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.6% | 9.1% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Malaysians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Malaysians are French Canadian (22.2%, a difference of 0.0%), French (22.2%, a difference of 0.26%), Cape Verdean (22.3%, a difference of 0.40%), Bermudan (22.3%, a difference of 0.48%), and Vietnamese (22.0%, a difference of 0.56%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Thailand | 5.0 /100 | #232 | Tragic 22.0% |
Spaniards | 4.7 /100 | #233 | Tragic 22.0% |
Spanish | 4.7 /100 | #234 | Tragic 22.0% |
Dutch | 4.6 /100 | #235 | Tragic 22.0% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 4.2 /100 | #236 | Tragic 22.0% |
Vietnamese | 4.0 /100 | #237 | Tragic 22.0% |
French Canadians | 2.8 /100 | #238 | Tragic 22.2% |
Malaysians | 2.8 /100 | #239 | Tragic 22.2% |
French | 2.3 /100 | #240 | Tragic 22.2% |
Cape Verdeans | 2.1 /100 | #241 | Tragic 22.3% |
Bermudans | 2.0 /100 | #242 | Tragic 22.3% |
West Indians | 1.9 /100 | #243 | Tragic 22.3% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 1.9 /100 | #244 | Tragic 22.3% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 1.8 /100 | #245 | Tragic 22.3% |
Liberians | 1.4 /100 | #246 | Tragic 22.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Taiwan (16.4%, a difference of 1.3%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (16.5%, a difference of 2.4%), Immigrants from India (16.8%, a difference of 4.2%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (17.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and Filipino (17.0%, a difference of 5.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 16.1% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 16.4% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 16.5% |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 17.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |