Korean vs Chinese Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Korean
Chinese
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Koreans
Chinese
18.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
34th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
1st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Korean vs Chinese Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 499,036,365 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Koreans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.240 and weighted average of 18.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,651,041 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.244 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 15.3%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Korean | Chinese |
Minimum | 1.8% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 56.2% | 43.0% |
Range | 54.5% | 41.7% |
Mean | 17.8% | 16.1% |
Median | 16.1% | 16.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.4% | 9.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.2% | 20.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.8% | 10.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.3% | 9.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.3% | 9.1% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Koreans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Koreans are Immigrants from Japan (18.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Philippines (18.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Turkish (18.7%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (18.6%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Armenia (18.7%, a difference of 0.26%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 18.4% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 18.5% |
Immigrants | Poland | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 18.5% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 18.5% |
Immigrants | Asia | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Koreans | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Turks | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 18.7% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 18.7% |
Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Taiwan (16.4%, a difference of 1.3%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (16.5%, a difference of 2.4%), Immigrants from India (16.8%, a difference of 4.2%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (17.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and Filipino (17.0%, a difference of 5.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 16.1% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 16.4% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 16.5% |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 17.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |