Syrian vs Celtic Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Syrian
Celtic
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Syrians
Celtics
20.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
90.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
140th/ 347
METRIC RANK
22.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
260th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Syrian vs Celtic Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 263,006,420 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Syrians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.150 and weighted average of 20.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,592,415 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.360 and weighted average of 22.7%, a difference of 12.1%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Syrian | Celtic |
Minimum | 0.97% | 11.1% |
Maximum | 58.7% | 100.0% |
Range | 57.7% | 88.9% |
Mean | 21.0% | 33.1% |
Median | 20.2% | 27.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.6% | 22.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 26.4% | 39.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.8% | 17.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.0% | 16.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.8% | 16.7% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Syrians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Syrians are Slovene (20.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Kuwait (20.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Nepal (20.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from North America (20.3%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Iraq (20.2%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | England | 91.9 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 91.5 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 91.2 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Canada | 91.2 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 90.6 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Slovenes | 90.5 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 90.4 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Syrians | 90.4 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Immigrants | North America | 89.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 20.3% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 89.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 20.3% |
Australians | 88.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 20.3% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 88.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 20.3% |
Austrians | 85.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 20.4% |
Venezuelans | 85.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 20.4% |
South Africans | 85.3 /100 | #147 | Excellent 20.4% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are White/Caucasian (22.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Bahamian (22.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (22.8%, a difference of 0.27%), Sudanese (22.6%, a difference of 0.41%), and British West Indian (22.8%, a difference of 0.52%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.9 /100 | #253 | Tragic 22.5% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.8 /100 | #254 | Tragic 22.6% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.8 /100 | #255 | Tragic 22.6% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.8 /100 | #256 | Tragic 22.6% |
Sudanese | 0.7 /100 | #257 | Tragic 22.6% |
Bahamians | 0.6 /100 | #258 | Tragic 22.7% |
Whites/Caucasians | 0.6 /100 | #259 | Tragic 22.7% |
Celtics | 0.5 /100 | #260 | Tragic 22.7% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.4 /100 | #261 | Tragic 22.8% |
British West Indians | 0.4 /100 | #262 | Tragic 22.8% |
Scotch-Irish | 0.3 /100 | #263 | Tragic 22.9% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.3 /100 | #264 | Tragic 22.9% |
Central Americans | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 23.0% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 23.0% |
Senegalese | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 23.0% |