Immigrants from Canada Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Canada
Select to Compare
Single Female Poverty
Immigrants from Canada Single Female Poverty
20.2%
POVERTY | SINGLE FEMALES
91.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
136th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Canada Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 448,621,148 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Canada and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.751 and weighted average of 20.2%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Canada within a typical geography, there is an increase of 3.0% in poverty level among single females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Canada and poverty level among single females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Canada influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single females within an area, or if Immigrants from Canada simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Canada by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Canada are Immigrants from Iraq (20.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Venezuela (20.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Nepal (20.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Slovene (20.3%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from England (20.2%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants from Morocco | 92.4 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants from Hungary | 92.3 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Pakistanis | 92.1 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Uruguayans | 92.1 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants from England | 91.9 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants from Venezuela | 91.5 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants from Iraq | 91.2 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants from Canada | 91.2 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants from Nepal | 90.6 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Slovenes | 90.5 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Immigrants from Kuwait | 90.4 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Syrians | 90.4 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Immigrants from North America | 89.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Immigrants from Uganda | 89.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Australians | 88.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 20.3% |
Immigrants from Canada Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Canada Data | Single Female Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.19% | 17.0% |
| Maximum | 33.3% | 100.0% |
| Range | 33.1% | 83.0% |
| Mean | 8.7% | 49.2% |
| Median | 7.4% | 41.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.7% | 22.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.3% | 70.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.6% | 48.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.2% | 28.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.1% | 28.3% |
Correlation Details
| Immigrants from Canada Percentile | Sample Size | Single Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.19% | 372,102,728 | 22.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.68% | 57,545,302 | 17.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.19% | 12,529,005 | 17.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.69% | 4,202,273 | 18.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.21% | 1,161,608 | 21.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.72% | 532,381 | 22.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.20% | 160,129 | 25.6% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.68% | 83,205 | 34.8% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.11% | 134,461 | 23.3% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.67% | 35,583 | 22.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.13% | 27,077 | 30.5% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.83% | 6,276 | 83.1% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.13% | 27,076 | 35.9% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.75% | 9,945 | 30.9% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.18% | 25,292 | 28.2% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.54% | 8,000 | 21.5% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.23% | 243 | 69.9% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.82% | 3,867 | 70.3% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.44% | 6,663 | 83.9% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.62% | 759 | 55.3% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.08% | 2,004 | 54.3% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.89% | 716 | 100.0% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.32% | 53 | 100.0% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.97% | 3,284 | 49.1% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.18% | 2,726 | 47.6% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.70% | 63 | 50.0% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.59% | 4,196 | 71.5% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.74% | 3,669 | 70.4% |
[ 24.0% - 24.5% ] 24.26% | 2,498 | 100.0% |
[ 33.0% - 33.5% ] 33.33% | 66 | 100.0% |