Delaware vs Chinese Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Delaware
Chinese
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Delaware
Chinese
22.5%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
1.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
252nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
1st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Delaware vs Chinese Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 95,602,651 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Delaware and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.151 and weighted average of 22.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,651,041 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.244 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 39.5%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Delaware | Chinese |
| Minimum | 0.74% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 66.7% | 43.0% |
| Range | 65.9% | 41.7% |
| Mean | 24.1% | 16.1% |
| Median | 22.0% | 16.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.3% | 9.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.0% | 20.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.6% | 10.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.4% | 9.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.2% | 9.1% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Delaware by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Delaware are Immigrants from Liberia (22.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from West Indies (22.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (22.6%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Sudan (22.6%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Bahamas (22.5%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 1.8 /100 | #245 | Tragic 22.3% |
| Liberians | 1.4 /100 | #246 | Tragic 22.4% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 22.4% |
| Belizeans | 1.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 22.4% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 1.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 22.4% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 1.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 1.0 /100 | #251 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Delaware | 1.0 /100 | #252 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.9 /100 | #253 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.8 /100 | #254 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.8 /100 | #255 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.8 /100 | #256 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Sudanese | 0.7 /100 | #257 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Bahamians | 0.6 /100 | #258 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.6 /100 | #259 | Tragic 22.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Taiwan (16.4%, a difference of 1.3%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (16.5%, a difference of 2.4%), Immigrants from India (16.8%, a difference of 4.2%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (17.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and Filipino (17.0%, a difference of 5.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 16.5% |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 17.3% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |