Swedish vs Chinese Female Disability
COMPARE
Swedish
Chinese
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Swedes
Chinese
12.3%
FEMALE DISABILITY
26.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
195th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.3%
FEMALE DISABILITY
22.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
201st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Swedish vs Chinese Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 539,030,282 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Swedes and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.528 and weighted average of 12.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,802,500 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.201 and weighted average of 12.3%, a difference of 0.23%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Swedish | Chinese |
| Minimum | 3.5% | 2.7% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 27.1% |
| Range | 96.5% | 24.4% |
| Mean | 18.5% | 13.3% |
| Median | 12.9% | 12.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.7% | 11.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.0% | 14.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.3% | 3.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.8% | 4.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.7% | 4.3% |
Demographics Similar to Swedes and Chinese by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Swedes are Ukrainian (12.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Northern European (12.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Panama (12.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Honduran (12.3%, a difference of 0.060%), and Mexican American Indian (12.3%, a difference of 0.080%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Trinidadian and Tobagonian (12.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Somali (12.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Barbados (12.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Zaire (12.3%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Grenada (12.4%, a difference of 0.090%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
| Immigrants | North America | 32.8 /100 | #188 | Fair 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 31.6 /100 | #189 | Fair 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 31.3 /100 | #190 | Fair 12.3% |
| Armenians | 29.7 /100 | #191 | Fair 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 29.2 /100 | #192 | Fair 12.3% |
| Northern Europeans | 27.5 /100 | #193 | Fair 12.3% |
| Ukrainians | 27.2 /100 | #194 | Fair 12.3% |
| Swedes | 26.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 25.5 /100 | #196 | Fair 12.3% |
| Hondurans | 25.4 /100 | #197 | Fair 12.3% |
| Mexican American Indians | 24.9 /100 | #198 | Fair 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 24.7 /100 | #199 | Fair 12.3% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 22.4 /100 | #200 | Fair 12.3% |
| Chinese | 22.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 12.3% |
| Somalis | 21.5 /100 | #202 | Fair 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 21.1 /100 | #203 | Fair 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 20.9 /100 | #204 | Fair 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 20.5 /100 | #205 | Fair 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 20.2 /100 | #206 | Fair 12.4% |
| Croatians | 20.2 /100 | #207 | Fair 12.4% |
| Basques | 17.5 /100 | #208 | Poor 12.4% |