Swedish vs Moroccan Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Swedish
Moroccan
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Swedes
Moroccans
20.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
77.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
153rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
52.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
171st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Swedish vs Moroccan Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 521,559,813 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Swedes and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.661 and weighted average of 20.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 200,405,308 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Moroccans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.538 and weighted average of 21.0%, a difference of 1.8%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Swedish | Moroccan |
| Minimum | 7.9% | 10.5% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 53.5% |
| Range | 92.1% | 43.0% |
| Mean | 35.5% | 24.5% |
| Median | 26.8% | 20.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 20.1% | 18.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 43.5% | 31.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 23.4% | 13.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 23.9% | 10.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 23.7% | 10.1% |
Demographics Similar to Swedes and Moroccans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Swedes are Immigrants from Western Europe (20.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Uruguay (20.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Samoan (20.6%, a difference of 0.10%), South American Indian (20.6%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Oceania (20.7%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Moroccans are New Zealander (21.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Guyanese (21.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (20.9%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (20.9%, a difference of 0.56%), and Norwegian (20.8%, a difference of 0.66%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |
| Swedes | 77.1 /100 | #153 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 20.6% |
| Samoans | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 20.6% |
| South American Indians | 75.7 /100 | #156 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |
| Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
| Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
| Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
| Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |
| Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |
| Iraqis | 64.5 /100 | #164 | Good 20.8% |
| Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
| Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 63.0 /100 | #167 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 61.5 /100 | #168 | Good 20.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 56.3 /100 | #169 | Average 20.9% |
| New Zealanders | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 21.0% |
| Moroccans | 52.8 /100 | #171 | Average 21.0% |
| Guyanese | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 21.0% |