Native/Alaskan vs Chickasaw Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Native/Alaskan
Chickasaw
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Natives/Alaskans
Chickasaw
19.6%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
332nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.3%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Native/Alaskan vs Chickasaw Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 444,255,067 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.553 and weighted average of 19.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,053,704 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.328 and weighted average of 16.3%, a difference of 20.2%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Native/Alaskan | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 4.3% | 4.0% |
| Maximum | 75.0% | 67.9% |
| Range | 70.7% | 63.9% |
| Mean | 31.7% | 25.6% |
| Median | 29.9% | 23.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.7% | 16.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 41.5% | 31.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 22.8% | 14.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.2% | 12.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.2% | 12.6% |
Demographics Similar to Natives/Alaskans and Chickasaw by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Natives/Alaskans are Paiute (19.3%, a difference of 1.7%), Inupiat (20.0%, a difference of 1.9%), Pima (20.2%, a difference of 2.7%), Cajun (19.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and Colville (18.4%, a difference of 6.4%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Chippewa (16.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Marshallese (16.4%, a difference of 0.78%), Black/African American (16.2%, a difference of 0.80%), Osage (16.5%, a difference of 0.91%), and Dutch West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 17.2% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 19.1% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 19.3% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 19.6% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 20.0% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 20.2% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 21.3% |