Marshallese vs Chickasaw Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Marshallese
Chickasaw
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Marshallese
Chickasaw
16.4%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
320th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.3%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Marshallese vs Chickasaw Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 14,469,521 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Marshallese and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.408 and weighted average of 16.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,053,704 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.328 and weighted average of 16.3%, a difference of 0.78%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Marshallese | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 7.9% | 4.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 67.9% |
Range | 92.1% | 63.9% |
Mean | 38.6% | 25.6% |
Median | 23.3% | 23.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.4% | 16.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 73.5% | 31.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 63.1% | 14.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 33.7% | 12.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 32.3% | 12.6% |
Demographics Similar to Marshallese and Chickasaw by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Marshallese are Osage (16.5%, a difference of 0.13%), Chippewa (16.4%, a difference of 0.48%), Shoshone (16.7%, a difference of 1.4%), Black/African American (16.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and Dutch West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 1.9%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Chippewa (16.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Black/African American (16.2%, a difference of 0.80%), Osage (16.5%, a difference of 0.91%), Dutch West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and Cheyenne (16.1%, a difference of 1.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Americans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 15.8% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 15.9% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 16.0% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 16.0% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 16.1% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 16.1% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 16.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.1% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.0% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 17.2% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 17.7% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 18.3% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 18.4% |