French American Indian vs Chickasaw Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
French American Indian
Chickasaw
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
French American Indians
Chickasaw
15.0%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
298th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.3%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
French American Indian vs Chickasaw Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,004,458 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of French American Indians and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.509 and weighted average of 15.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,053,704 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.328 and weighted average of 16.3%, a difference of 9.0%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | French American Indian | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 11.4% | 4.0% |
Maximum | 76.9% | 67.9% |
Range | 65.5% | 63.9% |
Mean | 26.7% | 25.6% |
Median | 19.2% | 23.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.3% | 16.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 33.3% | 31.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.0% | 14.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.6% | 12.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.2% | 12.6% |
Demographics Similar to French American Indians and Chickasaw by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to French American Indians are Delaware (15.0%, a difference of 0.39%), Cree (15.1%, a difference of 0.84%), Dominican (15.2%, a difference of 1.7%), Alsatian (15.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and Aleut (15.4%, a difference of 2.9%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Black/African American (16.2%, a difference of 0.80%), Dutch West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 1.1%), Cheyenne (16.1%, a difference of 1.3%), Alaskan Athabascan (16.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and Cherokee (16.1%, a difference of 1.6%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 15.0% |
Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 15.0% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 15.1% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 15.2% |
Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 15.2% |
Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 15.4% |
Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 15.4% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 15.5% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 15.6% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 15.7% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 15.8% |
Americans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 15.8% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 15.9% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 16.0% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 16.0% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 16.1% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 16.1% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 16.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.1% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |