Blackfeet vs Chickasaw Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Blackfeet
Chickasaw
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Blackfeet
Chickasaw
15.5%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
305th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.3%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Blackfeet vs Chickasaw Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,257,695 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Blackfeet and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.152 and weighted average of 15.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,053,704 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.328 and weighted average of 16.3%, a difference of 5.3%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Blackfeet | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 10.3% | 4.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 67.9% |
Range | 89.7% | 63.9% |
Mean | 44.4% | 25.6% |
Median | 37.0% | 23.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 24.6% | 16.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 59.8% | 31.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 35.2% | 14.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 26.6% | 12.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 26.1% | 12.6% |
Demographics Similar to Blackfeet and Chickasaw by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Blackfeet are Pennsylvania German (15.6%, a difference of 0.43%), Alaska Native (15.4%, a difference of 0.53%), Aleut (15.4%, a difference of 0.64%), Ute (15.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and Alsatian (15.2%, a difference of 1.7%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Chippewa (16.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Marshallese (16.4%, a difference of 0.78%), Black/African American (16.2%, a difference of 0.80%), Osage (16.5%, a difference of 0.91%), and Dutch West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 15.2% |
Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 15.2% |
Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 15.4% |
Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 15.4% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 15.5% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 15.6% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 15.7% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 15.8% |
Americans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 15.8% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 15.9% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 16.0% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 16.0% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 16.1% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 16.1% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 16.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.1% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |