Iroquois vs Chickasaw Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Iroquois
Chickasaw
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Iroquois
Chickasaw
14.5%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
287th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.3%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iroquois vs Chickasaw Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 192,366,104 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.252 and weighted average of 14.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,053,704 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.328 and weighted average of 16.3%, a difference of 12.6%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Iroquois | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 2.4% | 4.0% |
| Maximum | 63.0% | 67.9% |
| Range | 60.6% | 63.9% |
| Mean | 23.0% | 25.6% |
| Median | 19.4% | 23.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.8% | 16.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 33.3% | 31.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 20.5% | 14.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.1% | 12.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.7% | 12.6% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Iroquois by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are White/Caucasian (14.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Dominica (14.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Celtic (14.5%, a difference of 0.13%), U.S. Virgin Islander (14.5%, a difference of 0.32%), and French (14.4%, a difference of 0.45%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Hmong | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 14.4% |
| French | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Celtics | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 14.5% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 14.6% |
| French Canadians | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 14.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Chippewa (16.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Marshallese (16.4%, a difference of 0.78%), Black/African American (16.2%, a difference of 0.80%), Osage (16.5%, a difference of 0.91%), and Dutch West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.0% |