British West Indian vs Chickasaw Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
British West Indian
Chickasaw
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
British West Indians
Chickasaw
13.4%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
3.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
237th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.3%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
British West Indian vs Chickasaw Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 145,852,012 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of British West Indians and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.088 and weighted average of 13.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,053,704 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.328 and weighted average of 16.3%, a difference of 22.1%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | British West Indian | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 3.1% | 4.0% |
Maximum | 38.5% | 67.9% |
Range | 35.3% | 63.9% |
Mean | 14.6% | 25.6% |
Median | 13.3% | 23.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.3% | 16.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.8% | 31.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.4% | 14.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.2% | 12.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.2% | 12.6% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to British West Indians by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to British West Indians are Luxembourger (13.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Ghana (13.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Bangladeshi (13.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Czechoslovakian (13.4%, a difference of 0.18%), and British (13.3%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Ghanaians | 6.1 /100 | #230 | Tragic 13.3% |
Slavs | 5.3 /100 | #231 | Tragic 13.3% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 5.0 /100 | #232 | Tragic 13.3% |
British | 4.0 /100 | #233 | Tragic 13.3% |
Canadians | 4.0 /100 | #234 | Tragic 13.3% |
Bangladeshis | 3.7 /100 | #235 | Tragic 13.3% |
Luxembourgers | 3.6 /100 | #236 | Tragic 13.4% |
British West Indians | 3.4 /100 | #237 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 3.2 /100 | #238 | Tragic 13.4% |
Czechoslovakians | 3.0 /100 | #239 | Tragic 13.4% |
Belizeans | 2.3 /100 | #240 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Germany | 2.1 /100 | #241 | Tragic 13.4% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 2.1 /100 | #242 | Tragic 13.4% |
Barbadians | 2.1 /100 | #243 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 1.7 /100 | #244 | Tragic 13.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Chippewa (16.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Marshallese (16.4%, a difference of 0.78%), Black/African American (16.2%, a difference of 0.80%), Osage (16.5%, a difference of 0.91%), and Dutch West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 16.0% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 16.0% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 16.1% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 16.1% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 16.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.1% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.0% |