Native/Alaskan vs Cajun Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Native/Alaskan
Cajun
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Natives/Alaskans
Cajuns
19.6%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
332nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.1%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
330th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Native/Alaskan vs Cajun Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 444,255,067 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.553 and weighted average of 19.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,673,015 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Cajuns and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.485 and weighted average of 19.1%, a difference of 2.8%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Native/Alaskan | Cajun |
| Minimum | 4.3% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 75.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 70.7% | 98.7% |
| Mean | 31.7% | 28.9% |
| Median | 29.9% | 23.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.7% | 15.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 41.5% | 35.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 22.8% | 19.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.2% | 20.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.2% | 19.9% |
Demographics Similar to Natives/Alaskans and Cajuns by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Natives/Alaskans are Paiute (19.3%, a difference of 1.7%), Inupiat (20.0%, a difference of 1.9%), Pima (20.2%, a difference of 2.7%), Colville (18.4%, a difference of 6.4%), and Kiowa (18.3%, a difference of 7.2%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cajuns are Paiute (19.3%, a difference of 1.1%), Colville (18.4%, a difference of 3.5%), Kiowa (18.3%, a difference of 4.2%), Inupiat (20.0%, a difference of 4.8%), and Pima (20.2%, a difference of 5.7%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 17.2% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 19.1% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 19.3% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 19.6% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 20.0% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 20.2% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 21.3% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 22.2% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 23.3% |