Immigrants vs Chickasaw Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants
Chickasaw
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants
Chickasaw
12.7%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
70.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
153rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.3%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants vs Chickasaw Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 470,345,123 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.501 and weighted average of 12.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,053,704 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.328 and weighted average of 16.3%, a difference of 28.9%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 4.4% | 4.0% |
Maximum | 26.2% | 67.9% |
Range | 21.8% | 63.9% |
Mean | 12.4% | 25.6% |
Median | 12.5% | 23.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.0% | 16.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.5% | 31.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 14.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.1% | 12.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.1% | 12.6% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants are Immigrants from Scotland (12.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Australian (12.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Spain (12.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Hungary (12.6%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Panama (12.6%, a difference of 0.13%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Native Hawaiians | 75.0 /100 | #146 | Good 12.6% |
Malaysians | 74.8 /100 | #147 | Good 12.6% |
Yugoslavians | 73.9 /100 | #148 | Good 12.6% |
Sierra Leoneans | 73.0 /100 | #149 | Good 12.6% |
Immigrants | Panama | 72.1 /100 | #150 | Good 12.6% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 71.9 /100 | #151 | Good 12.6% |
Australians | 71.4 /100 | #152 | Good 12.6% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 70.1 /100 | #153 | Good 12.7% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 68.9 /100 | #154 | Good 12.7% |
Immigrants | Spain | 68.7 /100 | #155 | Good 12.7% |
Vietnamese | 67.9 /100 | #156 | Good 12.7% |
Latvians | 67.9 /100 | #157 | Good 12.7% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 64.9 /100 | #158 | Good 12.7% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 64.2 /100 | #159 | Good 12.7% |
Greeks | 64.1 /100 | #160 | Good 12.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Chippewa (16.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Marshallese (16.4%, a difference of 0.78%), Black/African American (16.2%, a difference of 0.80%), Osage (16.5%, a difference of 0.91%), and Dutch West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 16.0% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 16.0% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 16.1% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 16.1% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 16.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.1% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.0% |