Native/Alaskan vs Tohono O'odham Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Native/Alaskan
Tohono O'odham
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Natives/Alaskans
Tohono O'odham
19.6%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
332nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.6%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
336th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Native/Alaskan vs Tohono O'odham Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 444,255,067 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.553 and weighted average of 19.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,748,235 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.514 and weighted average of 21.6%, a difference of 9.9%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Native/Alaskan | Tohono O'odham |
Minimum | 4.3% | 11.9% |
Maximum | 75.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 70.7% | 88.1% |
Mean | 31.7% | 41.3% |
Median | 29.9% | 34.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.7% | 23.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 41.5% | 60.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 22.8% | 37.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.2% | 26.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.2% | 25.6% |
Demographics Similar to Natives/Alaskans and Tohono O'odham by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Natives/Alaskans are Paiute (19.3%, a difference of 1.7%), Inupiat (20.0%, a difference of 1.9%), Pima (20.2%, a difference of 2.7%), Cajun (19.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and Colville (18.4%, a difference of 6.4%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tohono O'odham are Apache (21.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Pueblo (21.6%, a difference of 0.28%), Yuman (21.3%, a difference of 1.2%), Arapaho (21.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and Sioux (22.2%, a difference of 3.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.0% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 17.2% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 17.7% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 18.3% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 18.4% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 19.1% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 19.3% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 19.6% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 20.0% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 20.2% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 21.3% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 21.6% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 21.6% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 21.6% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 21.9% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 22.2% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 23.3% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 23.5% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 25.1% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 25.2% |