Native/Alaskan vs Chickasaw Female Poverty
COMPARE
Native/Alaskan
Chickasaw
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Natives/Alaskans
Chickasaw
19.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
331st/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Native/Alaskan vs Chickasaw Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 512,476,258 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.642 and weighted average of 19.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,289 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.004 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 21.0%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Native/Alaskan | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 2.3% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 50.5% | 38.6% |
| Range | 48.2% | 36.7% |
| Mean | 25.5% | 18.1% |
| Median | 23.5% | 17.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.3% | 14.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 31.8% | 20.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.5% | 6.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.2% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.1% | 5.9% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Natives/Alaskans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Natives/Alaskans are Apache (19.2%, a difference of 0.16%), Dominican (19.1%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (19.3%, a difference of 0.76%), Kiowa (18.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and Black/African American (18.6%, a difference of 3.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 18.0% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 18.0% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 19.1% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 19.2% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 19.2% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 19.3% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 20.0% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 20.2% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 20.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 20.8% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 20.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Iroquois (15.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.50%), Haitian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%), and Barbadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |