Iroquois vs Chickasaw Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Iroquois
Chickasaw
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Iroquois
Chickasaw
19.9%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
277th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.5%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
265th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iroquois vs Chickasaw Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 206,484,755 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.678 and weighted average of 19.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,366,373 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.278 and weighted average of 19.5%, a difference of 2.1%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Iroquois | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 6.7% | 5.1% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 68.8% |
Range | 93.3% | 63.7% |
Mean | 29.7% | 24.3% |
Median | 25.6% | 21.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.3% | 18.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 36.0% | 27.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.6% | 9.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.9% | 10.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.7% | 10.6% |
Demographics Similar to Iroquois and Chickasaw by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Bangladeshi (19.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Subsaharan African (19.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Comanche (19.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Barbados (19.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Belizean (19.9%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Liberian (19.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Ecuador (19.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Vietnamese (19.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Cherokee (19.5%, a difference of 0.40%), and Immigrants from Guyana (19.4%, a difference of 0.49%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 19.4% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 19.4% |
Vietnamese | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 19.4% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 19.4% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 19.5% |
Liberians | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 19.5% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 19.5% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 19.7% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 19.7% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 19.7% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 19.7% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 19.8% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 19.8% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 19.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 19.9% |
Belizeans | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 19.9% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 19.9% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 19.9% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 19.9% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 19.9% |
Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 20.0% |