Iroquois vs Chickasaw Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
COMPARE
Iroquois
Chickasaw
Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Comparison
Iroquois
Chickasaw
22.0%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 5
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
302nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.8%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 5
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
299th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iroquois vs Chickasaw Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,992,045 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and poverty level among children under the age of 5 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.599 and weighted average of 22.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 145,649,363 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among children under the age of 5 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.075 and weighted average of 21.8%, a difference of 0.83%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Iroquois | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 1.6% | 1.7% |
Maximum | 66.3% | 56.1% |
Range | 64.7% | 54.4% |
Mean | 31.3% | 27.1% |
Median | 25.7% | 25.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 22.1% | 19.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 41.9% | 33.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 19.8% | 14.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.1% | 11.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.8% | 11.2% |
Demographics Similar to Iroquois and Chickasaw by Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
In terms of child poverty under the age of 5, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Inupiat (22.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Central America (22.0%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Guatemala (22.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Alaskan Athabascan (21.8%, a difference of 0.83%), and Blackfeet (21.8%, a difference of 0.84%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Blackfeet (21.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Alaskan Athabascan (21.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Hispanic or Latino (21.7%, a difference of 0.39%), Yaqui (21.7%, a difference of 0.41%), and Cherokee (21.7%, a difference of 0.56%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 21.4% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 21.4% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 21.6% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 21.6% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 21.6% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 21.7% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 21.7% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 21.7% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 21.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 21.8% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 21.8% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 22.0% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 22.0% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 22.0% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 22.0% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 22.2% |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 22.3% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 22.7% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 22.7% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 22.7% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 22.8% |